Türkiye için el ele

Arkadaşlar ,

Ülkemizin son günlerde içinde bulunduğu zor durum ve adeta çepeçevre kuşatılmış olduğu havası, bir takım şer odaklarının harekete geçmesine ve adeta tarihten gelen kinlerini çeşitli vesilelerle kusma isteklerini harekete geçirmektedir.
Son olarak AB Dışilişkiler komisyonu tarafından hazırlanan taslakta Türkiyenin AB ye girebilmesi için öne sürdükleri Limanları ve hava sahasını Rumlara açma şartı ile birlikte " Ermeni soykırımı , Rum Pontus Soykırımı ve Süryani Soykırımı " gibi hayal mahsulu şeyleride kabul etmemiz istenmektedir.

AB ye girme hayalleriyle , bu birlikten gelen her isteğe kayıtşız şartsız evet diyen teslimiyetçi zihniyet ; maalesef hem siyasilerimizin hemde sivil toplum örgütlerimizin adeta üzerlerine ölü toprağı örtülmüşcesine bir sessizliğe bürünmelerine neden olmuştur.Hiç kimse bu saçma sapan isteğe kararlı bir tepki göstermemektedir.
Tepkiyi biz koyacağız. Ülkemizin ve çocuklarımızın geleceği açısından, bir avuç TÜRKİYE SEVDALISI insan tarafından kurulan ve kısa bir zaman içerisinde bir çığ gibi büyüyen BEYİN FIRTINASI KULÜBÜ ' müzün ( beyinfirtinasiklubu : BEYIN FIRTINASI KLUBU ) öncülüğünde bu tepkiyi önce AB Parlamenterlere sonra tüm dünyaya göstermek amacıyla bir girişim başlatılmıştır.

Aşağıdaki İngilizce protesto metnini lütfen mail adresini verdiğimiz AB Parlementerlerine ve tüm tanıdıklarınıza yollayınız.Zaman ; yan gelip yatma değil ,ülkemiz için tepki koymak, haklılığımızı göstermek zamanınıdır.HAYDİ ,TÜRKİYE İÇİN ELELE....

BEYİN FIRTINASI KULÜBÜ


******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************


Protesto metni;





Re: Defamatory content in Turkey's progress towards accession report by AFET.



Dear Sir/Madam,



As a Turkish citizen supporting friendly relations between Turkey and the EU, I found the draft report on "Turkey's progress towards accession" (2006/2118(INI)) and especially the 343 amendments to it voted and adopted by AFET on 4 September 2006 as appalling and defamatory against Turkey and Turkish people.



While it is in AFET's capacity and responsibility to report the positive and criticizing comments on accession process, with the 343 amendments largely shaped by racial and religious prejudices against Turkey, the report in question has well exceeded the boundaries of constructive criticism. The baseless accusations introduced by the amendments turned the report into a document seemingly aiming to defame and insult Turkish people and Turkey. Therefore, the draft report as it stands lacks of any credibility and convincingness and unfortunately bears the hallmarks of a deep-rooted antipathy towards Turkish people.



It is noteworthy that the amendments have come from the factions where there have been a historical resentment, prejudice against and conflict of interests with Turkey. Therefore, it is difficult to claim that the report has been written in an objective manner.



Among the many examples, the report

- accuses some legal and legitimate Turkish NGOs as being 'racist�, since an MEP did not share the political opinions of the organization. Without a court decision, the claim by the MEP can be legally classed as a defamation and libeling (1)

- mentions the surreal claims that Turkish people committed genocide against Pontic Greeks, although the reality was closer to the other way around. (More than 2.5 million Turkish people have been ethnically cleansed from the Greek and Balkan soils in that period)(2)

- claims that Turkish people committed genocide against Assyrians, a claim even the Assyrian organizations reacted. (3)



It is notable that when faced with similar accusations against the EU member countries, the owners of the mentioned and many other amendment proposals have acted contradictorily in the past(4), presenting an apparent duality and insincerity.



The factual errors and conflicts in the report are abundant. The sheer volume of the amendments turned the important report to an incoherent document where the urban stories mix with irrational claims and unsubstantiated, even surreal allegations.



The defamatory, even xenophobic content introduced due to ethnic nationalism in the report, left uncorrected in due manner, has the potential to damage EP�s had-earned credibility and to jeopardize its chances to be taken seriously in the legislative process of Turkey's EU accession.



I believe that xenophobia and racial prejudices should be eliminated in the new Europe. To this effect, I invite the respectable members of the EP to honour the reality by eliminating these elements from the report before the voting on it at the end of September 2006. I further invite the members of EP to seriously revise not only the report, but also the attitude towards Turkey and Turkish people by keeping the discussion on Turkey�s accession process away from ethnic defamation at all levels. This would not only serve to the better relations of EU and Turkey, but also to the long-term credibility of the EP.



Yours faithfully,



Name (Ad) Surname (Soyad)



********************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Mail Adresleri ekli dosyada bulunmaktadır.Adresleri yukarıdan aşağıya doğru kopyalayıp , yollayacağınız maildeki Kime hanesine yapıştırınız.
*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Eklentiler

eposta.txt (6.3 KB, 13 görüntüleme)